Summary for Policymakers of IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 Degrees C Approved by Governments

Pinterest
Copy
WhatsApp
Open Modal

Share this on

Print
Open Modal

Print content

Reading Time: 8 minutes
Help keep family & friends informed by sharing this article

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Press Release, October 8, 2018 

Incheon, Republic of Korea, October 8 – Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society, the IPCC said in a new assessment. With clear benefits to people and natural ecosystems, limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to 2°C could go hand in hand with ensuring a more sustainable and equitable society, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said on Monday. 

The “Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C” was approved by the IPCC on Saturday in Incheon, Republic of Korea. It will be a key scientific input into the Katowice Climate Change Conference in Poland in December, when governments review the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change. 

“With more than 6,000 scientific references cited and the dedicated contribution of thousands of expert and government reviewers worldwide, this important report testifies to the breadth and policy relevance of the IPCC,” said Hoesung Lee, Chair of the IPCC. 

Ninety-one authors and review editors from 40 countries prepared the IPCC report in response to an invitation from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) when it adopted the Paris Agreement in 2015. 

The report’s full name is “Global Warming of 1.5°C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.” 

“One of the key messages that comes out very strongly from this report is that we are already seeing the consequences of 1°C of global warming through more extreme weather, rising sea levels and diminishing Arctic sea ice, among other changes,” said Panmao Zhai, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group I. 

The report highlights a number of climate change impacts that could be avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to 2°C, or more. For instance, by 2100, global sea level rise would be 10 cm lower with global warming of 1.5°C compared with 2°C. The likelihood of an Arctic Ocean free of sea ice in summer would be once per century with global warming of 1.5°C, compared with at least once per decade with 2°C. Coral reefs would decline by 70-90 percent with global warming of 1.5°C, whereas virtually all (>99 percent) would be lost with 2°C. 

“Every extra bit of warming matters, especially since warming of 1.5°C or higher increases the risk associated with long-lasting or irreversible changes, such as the loss of some ecosystems,” said Hans-Otto Pörtner, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II. 

Limiting global warming would also give people and ecosystems more room to adapt and remain below relevant risk thresholds, added Pörtner. The report also examines pathways available to limit warming to 1.5°C, what it would take to achieve them and what the consequences could be. “The good news is that some of the kinds of actions that would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5°C are already underway around the world, but they would need to accelerate,” said Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Co-Chair of Working Group I. 

The report finds that limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require “rapid and far-reaching” transitions in land, energy, industry, buildings, transport, and cities. Global net human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would need to fall by about 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching ‘net zero’ around 2050. This means that any remaining emissions would need to be balanced by removing CO2 from the air. 

“Limiting warming to 1.5°C is possible within the laws of chemistry and physics but doing so would require unprecedented changes,” said Jim Skea, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III. 

Allowing the global temperature to temporarily exceed or ‘overshoot’ 1.5°C would mean a greater reliance on techniques that remove CO2 from the air to return global temperature to below 1.5°C by 2100. The effectiveness of such techniques are unproven at large scale and some may carry significant risks for sustainable development, the report notes. 

“Limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared with 2°C would reduce challenging impacts on ecosystems, human health and well-being, making it easier to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,” said Priyardarshi Shukla, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III. 

The decisions we make today are critical in ensuring a safe and sustainable world for everyone, both now and in the future, said Debra Roberts, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II. 

“This report gives policymakers and practitioners the information they need to make decisions that tackle climate change while considering local context and people’s needs. The next few years are probably the most important in our history,” she said. 

The IPCC is the leading world body for assessing the science related to climate change, its impacts and potential future risks, and possible response options. 

The report was prepared under the scientific leadership of all three IPCC working groups. Working Group I assesses the physical science basis of climate change; Working Group II addresses impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; and Working Group III deals with the mitigation of climate change. 

The Paris Agreement adopted by 195 nations at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC in December 2015 included the aim of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change by “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above preindustrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

” As part of the decision to adopt the Paris Agreement, the IPCC was invited to produce, in 2018, a Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. The IPCC accepted the invitation, adding that the Special Report would look at these issues in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. 

Global Warming of 1.5°C is the first in a series of Special Reports to be produced in the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Cycle. Next year the IPCC will release the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, and Climate Change and Land, which looks at how climate change affects land use. 

The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) presents the key findings of the Special Report, based on the assessment of the available scientific, technical and socio-economic literature relevant to global warming of 1.5°C. 

The Summary for Policymakers of the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR15) is available at https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15 or www.ipcc.ch

Key Statistics of the Special Report on Global Warming of Global Warming of 1.5°C 

91 authors from 44 citizenships and 40 countries of residence 

  • 14 Coordinating Lead Authors (CLAs) • 60 Lead Authors (LAs) 
  • 17 Review Editors (REs) 
  • 133 Contributing authors (CAs) 
  • Over 6,000 cited references 
  • A total of 42,001 expert and government review comments 

For more information, contact the IPCC Press Office at ipcc-media@wmo.int

Notes for Editors 

The “Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C,” known as SR15, is being prepared in response to an invitation from the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in December 2015, when they reached the Paris Agreement, and will inform the Talanoa Dialogue at the 24th Conference of the Parties (COP24). The Talanoa Dialogue will take stock of the collective efforts of Parties in relation to progress towards the long-term goal of the Paris Agreement, and to inform the preparation of nationally determined contributions. Details of the report, including the approved outline, can be found on the report page. The report was prepared under the joint scientific leadership of all three IPCC Working Groups, with support from the Working Group I Technical Support Unit. 

What is the IPCC? 

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the UN body for assessing the science related to climate change. It was established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UN Environment) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to provide policymakers with regular scientific assessments concerning climate change, its implications and potential future risks, as well as to put forward adaptation and mitigation strategies. It has 195 member states. 

IPCC assessments provide governments, at all levels, with scientific information that they can use to develop climate policies. IPCC assessments are a key input into the international negotiations to tackle climate change. IPCC reports are drafted and reviewed in several stages, thus guaranteeing objectivity and transparency. 

The IPCC assesses the thousands of scientific papers published each year to tell policymakers what we know and don’t know about the risks related to climate change. The IPCC identifies where there is agreement in the scientific community, where there are differences of opinion, and where further research is needed. It does not conduct its own research. 

To produce its reports, the IPCC mobilizes hundreds of scientists. These scientists and officials are drawn from diverse backgrounds. Only a dozen permanent staff work in the IPCC’s Secretariat. 

The IPCC has three working groups: Working Group I, dealing with the physical science basis of climate change; Working Group II, dealing with impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; and Working Group III, dealing with the mitigation of climate change. It also has a Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories that develops methodologies for measuring emissions and removals. 

IPCC Assessment Reports consist of contributions from each of the three working groups and a Synthesis Report. Special Reports undertake an assessment of crossdisciplinary issues that span more than one working group and are shorter and more focused than the main assessments. 

Sixth Assessment Cycle 

At its 41st Session in February 2015, the IPCC decided to produce a Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). At its 42nd Session in October 2015 it elected a new Bureau that would oversee the work on this report and Special Reports to be produced in the assessment cycle. At its 43rd Session in April 2016, it decided to produce three Special Reports, a Methodology Report and AR6. 

The Methodology Report to refine the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories will be delivered in 2019. Besides “Global Warming of 1.5°C,” the IPCC will finalize two further special reports in 2019: the “Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate and Climate Change and Land,” an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. The AR6 Synthesis Report will be finalized in the first half of 2022, following the three working group contributions to AR6 in 2021. 

For more information, including links to the IPCC reports, go to www.ipcc.ch

Our Comment 

This authoritative report should convince any responsible policymaker of average intelligence and a healthy conscience, of the moral imperative to act – in the best interests of “a more sustainable and equitable society” – on the “threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.” 

The challenge, though daunting, is presented as a viable alternative to the probable outcome of our present course. The prospect of “long-lasting or irreversible changes” is an incentive that policymakers need to take seriously if they are to do their part in promoting whatever effort and sacrifice it will take to avoid greater risk, “such as the loss of some ecosystems.” 

People and ecosystems both will need all the room they can get “to adapt and remain below relevant risk thresholds,” given our failure to heed the concerns about climate change at an earlier stage in the crisis. 

Luckily, this report is not a mere update on how crucial the situation is! The study is an impressive analysis of ways and means to deal with climate change, and their possible outcomes. 

Specific, reliable information about what is required to deal with climate change, while formidable, is positive. But, time is short! 

While the report “gives policymakers the information they need to make decisions that tackle climate change while considering local context and people’s needs,” the record of their response since 1988, and evidence of their contemporary level of concern and resolve, makes it clear that we cannot leave it up to them! 

COP24 will further fortify us to mobilize against recalcitrant representatives. 

Canada should be among those nations moving forward

We need to rally to this cause as Canada so nobly met the crisis of World War II, in 1939. 

At that time, Graham Towers, founding Governor of the Bank of Canada, appeared before Parliament’s Banking and Commerce Committee to explain what he had done and proposed to do. The following extracts from his testimony, are included in A Power Unto Itself, The Bank of Canada: 

Q: But there is no question about it that banks do create that medium of exchange? 

A: That is right. That is what they are there for…. That is banking business, just in the same way that a steel plant makes steel. 

Q: Ninety-five percent of all our volume of business is being done with what we call exchange of bank deposits – that is, simply bookkeeping entries in banks against which people write cheques? 

A: I think that is a fair statement. 

Q: When the government delivers a $1,000 bond to the bank, what does the bank use to purchase it with? Is it the creation of additional money? 

A; it is the creation of additional money. 

Q: Would you admit that anything physically possible and desirable can be made financially possible? 

A: Certainly. 

Q: Will you tell me why a government with power to create money should give that power away to a private monopoly [that is, the chartered banks] and then borrow that which Parliament can create itself, back at interest? 

A: Now, if Parliament wants to change the form of operating the bank system, then certainly that is within the power of Parliament (pages 56-57). 

The author, William Krehm, goes on to point out that “without the low-rate financing provided by their central banks, the Allied powers could not have won the war. Nor could they have won the subsequent peace.” 

Join! Act! Change! 

Élan

Share Now

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Informed,
Join Our Mailing List.
Its Free.

Your Information is safe: Privacy Policy

Support Comer

Your donations will help fund our research, education, and outreach activities as well as help cover our expenses.

Related Articles:

Stay Informed, Join Our Mailing List. Its Free.

Your Information is safe: Privacy Policy

Join our Mailing List to stay informed